Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Anything MG42 related.
Post Reply
42rocker
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3251
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:03 pm
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: Florida

Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by 42rocker »

As said, need help with a question on the trunnion or camming piece....
With most of the centerfiresystems kits it seems that the numbers are not matching. Now in the German manuel reprints (Thanks John) they say if replacing, to replace both parts as they were made together and should be replaced together...
Therefore what does everybody think about mismatched trunnion / camming pieces????? For semi auto use..
Ok, as long as they fit nicely?????


Ok, question on the bolt carrier, the bolt carrier was sand cast then machined. However some bolt carrier's have numbers that were made during the sand casting... Like 16 / 01 Are these numbers from the German WW2 time or yugo numbers or???


SOME help if you please.....

Thanks
Later 42rocker
Dan@AngolaArmory

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by Dan@AngolaArmory »

Tim,
I'm not sure about using a miss matched camming piece, maybe someone with more knowledge will chime in. If you need a matching one, you know where to look.
On the WWII bolt carriers, most, if not all had the cast in place numbers, IIRC.
Dan
rocco1911

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by rocco1911 »

I personally have used miss matched ones with no issues but again we are building semis that in no way get the workout a FA gun would get in that area hope this helps... :mrgreen:
User avatar
www.Prussia.us
General
General
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by www.Prussia.us »

I have built two SA42s, which is nothing compared to guys like Rocco. Both camming piece sets were not matching, BUT they made a nice firm fit. Also as most of the regulars know, the German war-time and Yugo (from what I have handled) never match up if you are trying to mix a Yugo piece with a German one to make a set. The Yugo are more beefy and robust, but of course I used German ones because I am nuts like that :lol:
“… corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, … until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

- Abraham Lincoln (Republican), Nov. 21, 1864
User avatar
JBaum
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3123
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:41 pm
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: NE Ohio
Contact:

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by JBaum »

An MG42 does not have a trunnion, so we're talking about the cam piece here: For semi guns, I wouldn't be afraid of well mated set, regardless of the actual numbers matching, but if a matching set is available for a few bucks more, I'd go with matching just to try to eliminate any possible problem 10 years from now. Either way, there are no guarantees that the matching set will last longer than a mismatched set anyway.

For the rest, I agree with the above.
John@German<remove this>Manuals.com

http://www.GermanManuals.com
Bil
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 4873
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Brookline,VT

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by Bil »

John,I see you are on your medication again,the 'T' word doesn't have its former effect! :lol: Or have you just given up on your effort to educate the masses? And I also agree about the above statements. ---bil
"I dream of a world where I can buy alcohol,tobacco and firearms from the same drive-up window,and use them all on the way home from work!" Dogbert
User avatar
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 2442
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:24 am
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: Minnesota

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by DARIVS ARCHITECTVS »

Bil wrote:John,I see you are on your medication again,the 'T' word doesn't have its former effect! :lol: Or have you just given up on your effort to educate the masses? And I also agree about the above statements. ---bil
John must be on sedatives. The "T" word didn't result in him exploding or another 2-1/2 hour bout of projectile vomit. :puk:

The visits to the shrink must have paid off handsomely.
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Knight's Armoury
Blanksguy
General
General
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Bay City, Michigan

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by Blanksguy »

I don't believe that the critical issue is the fit of the two pieces of the Camming-piece together.........but in the timing/location of where/when the inner cam-surfaces would lock/unlock the bolt-rollers ( IE: Left vs. right side cam.).

Most should be close enough for an SA42..."but" what would happen on an SA42 if one side unlocked a split second prior to the other when we talk about the pressures from live 8x57mm ammo (??) or 762x51mm/.308 cal live ammo (?).

Just something to think about during your build.
Regards, RichardS in MI.
Blanksguy2001@chartermi.net
User avatar
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 2442
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:24 am
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: Minnesota

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by DARIVS ARCHITECTVS »

Blanksguy wrote:I don't believe that the critical issue is the fit of the two pieces of the Camming-piece together.........but in the timing/location of where/when the inner cam-surfaces would lock/unlock the bolt-rollers ( IE: Left vs. right side cam.).

Most should be close enough for an SA42..."but" what would happen on an SA42 if one side unlocked a split second prior to the other when we talk about the pressures from live 8x57mm ammo (??) or 762x51mm/.308 cal live ammo (?).
Answer: Excess strain on one roller and also the bolt head. After a while, one of them would break from repeated stress cycling. That's bad, folks. DANGEROUS even.
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Knight's Armoury
Michael J

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by Michael J »

jbaum wrote:An MG42 does not have a trunnion, so we're talking about the cam piece here: For semi guns, I wouldn't be afraid of well mated set, regardless of the actual numbers matching, but if a matching set is available for a few bucks more, I'd go with matching just to try to eliminate any possible problem 10 years from now. Either way, there are no guarantees that the matching set will last longer than a mismatched set anyway.

For the rest, I agree with the above.
I know you can get a good (i'm guessing matching) set from marstar for like $20. That is pretty cheap, if it is possible for you guys to order them, sure seems like a deal to me.
User avatar
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 2442
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:24 am
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: Minnesota

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by DARIVS ARCHITECTVS »

Michael J wrote:
jbaum wrote:An MG42 does not have a trunnion, so we're talking about the cam piece here: For semi guns, I wouldn't be afraid of well mated set, regardless of the actual numbers matching, but if a matching set is available for a few bucks more, I'd go with matching just to try to eliminate any possible problem 10 years from now. Either way, there are no guarantees that the matching set will last longer than a mismatched set anyway.

For the rest, I agree with the above.
I know you can get a good (i'm guessing matching) set from marstar for like $20. That is pretty cheap, if it is possible for you guys to order them, sure seems like a deal to me.
$20.00 Shyeah Right!
DARIVS ARCHITECTVS
Knight's Armoury
User avatar
drooling idiot
General
General
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:30 am
Location: Philla ,PA

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by drooling idiot »

42rock wrote: a question on the camming piece....
With most of the kits it seems that the numbers are not matching.
Now in the German manual reprints they say if replacing, to replace both parts as they were made together and should be replaced together...
Therefore what does everybody think about mismatched camming pieces?????
OK, For semi auto use.. as long as they fit nicely?????
I edited your quote slightly.

First, I would have to say it would be irresponsible to give a blanket statement that it would be OK to do something contrary to the manual.
Can you get a MG42 style gun to run with a mismatched cam, YES. Is it a super great idea, NO.
If you aren't very very sure about the condition and fitment of the two pieces you should replace them.
Rocco is not your average homebuilder, if hes confident in the combination hes used, I'd shoot those guns.
For any newbie reading this thread I think its a bad idea to roll the dice when factory matched cams are currently available. Click here for link

While its true, a recreational use semi will not get near the work out of full-on military FA, I'm building these guns to pass down the generations. With that in my mind the service lifetime of a SA42 is much longer than a GOV. owned FA. If something were to go wrong the shooters of my guns are much less replaceable to me than the shooters of the GOV.s FAs are to the Gov. So I recognize its important to get good parts on them now and spares for later while they are available.
Please replace any questionable cams, do it "For the children". :lol:
"good , bad, .....I'm the man with the gun."

Its amazing anything works right around here with a bunch of
over-age juvenile delinquents running the place.
Michael J

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by Michael J »

DARIVS ARCHITECTVS wrote:
Michael J wrote:
jbaum wrote:An MG42 does not have a trunnion, so we're talking about the cam piece here: For semi guns, I wouldn't be afraid of well mated set, regardless of the actual numbers matching, but if a matching set is available for a few bucks more, I'd go with matching just to try to eliminate any possible problem 10 years from now. Either way, there are no guarantees that the matching set will last longer than a mismatched set anyway.

For the rest, I agree with the above.
I know you can get a good (i'm guessing matching) set from marstar for like $20. That is pretty cheap, if it is possible for you guys to order them, sure seems like a deal to me.
$20.00 Shyeah Right!
;)
M42-010 CAM $20.00
http://www.marstar.ca/mg42m53p.htm

If there's anyone who needs em, i can order em myself, german matching i'm guessing, as it is not specified that they are anything else. I'm still unsure if John sells MG parts to the civilian market, but i will find out monday if my order goes through for other parts.
Are you guys in America allowed to order MG parts from canada? We are legally allowed to export, so that should not be an issue.
blackreichswehr
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:09 am

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by blackreichswehr »

i'am on the same track with drooling idiot, this isthe heart and brains of this invention--without functional reliability its useless
User avatar
www.Prussia.us
General
General
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Bolt Carrier ? and trunnion / camming piece ?

Post by www.Prussia.us »

Michael,

Please do check with John, the last time I tried to get a matching German set at first I was told "fine," then I was told "no-can-do," because all they had were a few German half pieces "in the drawer" and then with a form 6 they would send it down to the states. There should be no need for a form 6 for a cam piece or set for that matter. :?

Maybe he has found and imported more????:D
“… corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, … until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

- Abraham Lincoln (Republican), Nov. 21, 1864
Post Reply