jbaum wrote:<SNIP>It isn't all ATF's fault.... <SNIP>
Well, actually probably 90% of the problem is and most of it came from one source - A guy named Sterling Nixon -
This guy was the Tech. Branch Chief for a number of years and he actually told me in the summer of 2003 that his goal was to ban the importation of parts kits because he saw no need for the average individual to have them. He hated the fact that guys like Brian at BRP, Len at Historic Arms, and others were taking kits, re-welding the receivers, and making semi's out of them.
So, his first order of business - change the receiver demil cut specification to try and make the receivers useless for use in rebuilding the receivers. Another ploy was to change the demil spec
AFTER the kits had been imported and sold then go to the vendors and make them recall the kits or charge them with importation of machine guns. Remember the Interordnance FAL fiasco or the Cole's UZIs, or the MAXIM side plate issue, and don't forget the most recent - The CZ-26 recall. There are just a few of the horror stories like this.
There is a funny little issue regarding the MAXIM sideplates - Remember when ATF said that all of the kits that were imported with only the right side plate removed were contraband and had to be surrendered to the ATF when they came a-calling? Loads of kits were turned over to local ATF agents when all that was contraband (at the time) was the left sideplate. What they didn't tell you was that if you removed the sideplate then you could keep the remainder of the kit.
Then I wrote Tech Branch a letter asking which sideplate was the registered part of the MAXIM - Guess what?? They sent me a letter saying it was the
RIGHT sideplate and you could legally own the
LEFT sideplate. Keystone Cops at their best...

Want to read the letter? here it is:
Page 1:
http://www.1919a4.com/batf/images/Vicke ... te.001.jpg
Page 2:
http://www.1919a4.com/batf/images/Vicke ... te.002.jpg
Anyway, when destroying the receivers as much as they could didn't have the desired effect, ATF (not proven but you can bet our buddy Sterling had a hand in it) gave us the barrel ban. So now we have kits that have useless receivers and no barrels or barrels that have had holes drilled in the chamber, center, and muzzle.
Another thing that our buddy did for us was get the ATF's lawyers involved with classification letters. Tech Branch now has a policy that requires
EVERY letter written by Tech Branch to be reviewed by the ATF's legal department. This is why some letters to them now take months and sometimes years to be answered. For example, I wrote a letter to them on September 8, 2006 and am still waiting for an answer.
The other 10% of the problem is with the UN - They will pay a country "X" number of dollars for every military firearm that they destroy. This is why thousands of STg-58 (FAL's) were destroyed by Austria and L1A1's (again FAL's) by Australia. Any number of historic military weapons have been destroyed under this program. The UN places a lot of pressure on these countries to participate in these programs and sometimes they will pay more than the importers are willing to pay for a demilled kit. Remember when you could buy a G-1 FAL kit for $99 from TAPCO? Thanks to the UN these same kits now sell for $250 and up.
These are just a few highlights of the problems we now have getting affordable kits and why the supply of them is drying up. No one will ever know all of the story, the hidden agendas that some folks at ATF and other government agencies have, or the back door deals that our government has made with the UN regarding this issue. Add to this the current makeup of Congress and you can bet that it's going to get worse, not better.
In closing let me say this - There are a lot of very good folks at Tech Branch and some of them have been
VERY helpful. We are lucky that Mr. Nixon is no longer at Tech Branch and lets hope that his replacement will be a more reasoned individual. Only time will tell.......
As always, this information is worth exactly what you paid for it -
Regards,
Orin