deactivated 1903a3s
deactivated 1903a3s
I was wondering if anyone has any experience w/ the Deactivated '03a3s
That I see advertised in SGN.
There's two different ads both selling these. they have a plugged Bbl. welded bolt face and, the Bbl. is tack welded to the Rec.
at around 200-300 ea. I was wondering if it'd be worth it to buy one and rebarrel it.
the bolt would need to be replaced and,the welded cut-off replaced as well
does anyone think their unsafe to rework and fire?
any input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan
That I see advertised in SGN.
There's two different ads both selling these. they have a plugged Bbl. welded bolt face and, the Bbl. is tack welded to the Rec.
at around 200-300 ea. I was wondering if it'd be worth it to buy one and rebarrel it.
the bolt would need to be replaced and,the welded cut-off replaced as well
does anyone think their unsafe to rework and fire?
any input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan
-
- Hauptgefreiter
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:23 pm
- Location: western mass usa
-
- Stabshauptmann
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:56 pm
- Location: 79 Wistful Vista
1903A3's were built new by Remington and Smith Corona and do not have the issues associated with early production 1903's.
The Army went through lenghty tests on these receivers and it was decided the risk did not warrant removing them from service. Between 1917 and 1929 there were 68 burst receivers. The story of these early receivers is often repeated without the individual repeating the story doing the research into the official investigation of this problem. Most often they quote Campbell's book on 1903's.
As an example one of the reasons given in the official report for the receiver failures had to do with WWI GI's cramming 8mm Mauser ammunition into an 03 and firing it. Needless to say firing a bullet much larger than the rifle was designed for increased chamber pressures just a bit above norm.
This article goes into great detail regarding the receiver problem - http://m1903.com/03rcvrfail/
As stated earlier don't waste your money trying to resurrect one of these welded up pieces of junk. Spend a little more and buy one that hasn't been screwed with.
The Army went through lenghty tests on these receivers and it was decided the risk did not warrant removing them from service. Between 1917 and 1929 there were 68 burst receivers. The story of these early receivers is often repeated without the individual repeating the story doing the research into the official investigation of this problem. Most often they quote Campbell's book on 1903's.
As an example one of the reasons given in the official report for the receiver failures had to do with WWI GI's cramming 8mm Mauser ammunition into an 03 and firing it. Needless to say firing a bullet much larger than the rifle was designed for increased chamber pressures just a bit above norm.
This article goes into great detail regarding the receiver problem - http://m1903.com/03rcvrfail/
As stated earlier don't waste your money trying to resurrect one of these welded up pieces of junk. Spend a little more and buy one that hasn't been screwed with.
Last edited by Roscoeturner on Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Oberfeldwebel
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:05 pm
I've rebuilt several of the "Drill Rifles". No problems with any of them. Of course I paid 75-100 per gun and have a case of 03A3 barrels that I bought 30 years ago for 5.00 each and have bolts purchased through the old DCM Program that cost about 1.75 each and other parts accumulated over the years. I can build em cheap, and have quite an accumulation of the rifles. My IRA!