Demilled MG34 Receivers from IMA & FAC

Post by **Reichpapers** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:31 pm

Prime examples of what you'll get if you order demilled MG34 receivers from FAC and IMA...not sure which is which. They have a bit of rust, but that seems normal. PLenty of overlap here to do the job....note the need of a good cam section...the last pic is a typical piece from BRP.

Post by **TOM R** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:34 pm

ok those look nasty

ak47dennis · Post by **ak47dennis** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:46 pm

Here is a left side view of my semi MG34 receiver right before the finally cosmetic welds were touched up and re-milled. What I received was no different then Reichpapers.

I will post more pictures of the conversion, but my knucklehead Labrador chewed my camera upload cable should be here soon.

MDMike · Post by **MDMike** » Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:30 pm

Great looking job there AK47Dennis. Did you use overlaping parts or Tig in the Blanks? I have an early (about 4 years ago) Inter Ord kit. Was wondering if you knew if this kit was rebuildable as is or was overlap of the reciever required. TIA, Mike

ak47dennis · Post by **ak47dennis** » Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:51 pm

My front section was like seen in Reichs picture and the rear sections was also a band saw cut, only the center section was torch cut.

Based on the I.O. receivers I have seen I would say that it very do-able but if you could eliminate a torch cut with an overlapped band saw cut section go for it!

MDMike · Post by **MDMike** » Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:09 am

Who has the band saw cut recievers?

BELTLEAD · Post by **BELTLEAD** » Sat Apr 16, 2005 1:09 pm

Bandsaw-cut MG34 receivers haven't been around since the mid-1980's.I have a band-saw cut MG34 receiver that was converted into a 80% reciever by a Class2 Manufacturer(BATF used to allow a receiver to be cut in half in half with a band-saw but they later required minimum torch three-cut receivers because guys were welding them back together very easily into full-auto's)